Recent Comments

The new lego head should be "Robin Bland" of course as he is...

Don't fear, more are on the way. We have four Season 3 comm...

DO MORE BABYLON 5 COMMENTARY'S!!!!!...

Interesting to read these comments from the perspective of 2...

Any moment of fine acting or that will give someone a fright...

Archives:

Random thoughts on Dredd

Judges Dredd and AndersonAfter what seems like an age since the original announcement, finally the new Judge Dredd film, named simply ‘Dredd‘, has hit UK cinemas.

Was it worth the wait? For me, definitely, yes.

Now I’m not a life long Judge Dredd fan and can’t ever remember reading an issue of 2000AD but, nonetheless, I am fairly familiar with Joe Dredd and Mega-City One. Most of my knowledge comes from playing the pen and paper RPG and, subsequently, the Big Finish full cast audio plays.  Oh, and there’s the Stallone film, too, but fortunately I’ve all but expunged that from my memory banks!

The first thing you’ll notice about this new film is that they’ve radically changed the look of Mega-City One and its inhabitants. Far from the dense, colourful, multi-leveled look prevalent in the comics, this big screen city is a flat, grey ocean of mostly low-rise buildings with largely spaced out mega blocks occasionally jutting forth.  Apart from the odd Justice Department drone, all traffic is very much on ground level.  This is city that could exist now, just with urban decay turned up one small notch.  It is very deliberately not visually exciting. This is a bleak environment, the same sort of five minutes into the future that Robocop gave us.

Also gone are the ‘safe’ swear words that are so familiar in many science fiction series (such as ‘fragging’, ‘fracking’ and Dredd’s ‘drokk’ – even ‘grud’ is dead!)  In the UK this film is an 18 certificate, so they were very right to drop those cod expletives – with the possible exception of Red Dwarf, I always find them cringeworthy!  Instead real world swearing is in and given the amount of violence involved in this film, that can only have been the right decision.

In essence the, rightly, British director (Pete Travis), equally British writer (Alex Garland) and their team have ‘Nolaned’ up the world of Judge Dredd.  This was, no doubt, influenced by the relatively small budget (half that of the Stallone film of 1995 and, if you take into account inflation, it’s really probably nearer only a third) but I suspect that even if they had a vastly bigger budget that they would still have gravitated towards a more grounded film reality.  I absolutely think they made the right call.  Stallone’s Judge Dredd film may have looked more authentic to the comics but this Dredd feels more authentic.

This brings us around to Karl Urban.  To my mind, he is Judge Dredd.  As Toby Longworth is the definitive audio Joe Dredd, Urban is the definitive film Dredd.  And yes, Dredd keeps his helmet on.  Okay, there is one shot where you can just about make out one of his eyes through the visor of his helmet but, that (no doubt mistake) aside, you never see his eyes and nor do you need to.  This Dredd does not laugh, does not smile and if you could see his eyes all you’d see is pretty a constant scowl anyway!  He is not entirely humourless, though, and has a good line in dead-pan terse comebacks, most of which are simply pitch-perfect deliveries of the word ‘yep’!  Don’t worry though, the film didn’t turn him into a one-line ‘joke’ cracker, like Roger Moore or Arnie at their worst!  No, Dredd is glacially cool, almost machine like.  He is the uncompromising tool of the police state that he should be.

Olivia Thirlby brings us a contrasting sidekick in the shape of Judge Cassandra Anderson.  She’s a rookie who’s on her last chance before being drummed out and would have been gone a long time before if it wasn’t for her psi abilities.  I more ‘know of’ than really know the character of Anderson and have far fewer preconceptions about who she is and how she should be played.  I have seen drawings and some of those vinyl models that ridiculously sexualise the character but, I’m happy to say, they didn’t do that with this film version.  Thirlby does a great job of juxtaposing Anderson’s humanity as compared to Dredd’s granite-like nature and all the violence they both must engage in to survive.

At its heart, it is nothing more than a simple survival film.  Our ‘heroes’ are trapped in enemy territory with little chance of rescue and must fight their way through whatever is thrown their way.  In many ways it is simply a day in the life of Judge Dredd, albeit probably a slightly more intense day than usual.  The implications for Mega-City One are slight, at best. The world isn’t needing to be saved, Dredd is barely changed by the experience (if at all), though Anderson is clearly hardened by it.  This film is very consciously an introduction to the world of Judge Dredd. If we are lucky enough to get a sequel, then we can probably expect a more world endangering plot and perhaps more of the fantastical elements to come into play (hints are being made of maybe a sequel involving the Dark Judges – incidentally, I couldn’t help be reminded of those four when another group of four judges turn up near the end of this film).

Viewers are certainly left to ponder the nature of the police state that is Mega-City One.  The political undertones are left as just undertones and while Dredd is nominally the hero there is no real attempt to paint him as such.  Dredd is tool of a fascist state, able to meter out summary justice with his ‘lawgiver’ gun.  Were the filmmakers right to leave the social commentary as subtext? I think they were, at least for this first film.  If we do get to see the Dark Judges or political strife in the Justice Department next time, then I’d expect a lot more to be made of such concepts.  Anderson is clearly more concerned with natural justice than simply and blindly applying the law and I’d expect any sequel that features her would also delve more deeply into that. As it is, this film does show some of the non-combatant residents of the Peach Trees block as innocents but otherwise the judges and ‘perps’ are about as bad as each another.

Nobody too squeamish should watch this new film (it’s 18 rated in the UK), it is pretty bloody and has some wonderfully shot slow motion effects that add even more to that bloody horror! A twisted sense of humour certainly helps, too. If that’s you, then I don’t hesitate to recommend Dredd.

2 Responses to "Random thoughts on Dredd"

  1. Ian McArdell says:

    Sounds great… I still can’t shake the inanity of the clearly non-identical clone that capped off the mess of the Stallone movie. What’s the 3D aspect like? Is it telling that you fail to mention it?

  2. I only have vague memories of the Stallone film but I do remember something about a non-identical clone. I don’t think the writer’s knew what a clone was! That and some insultingly obvious ‘hero arrives just in the nick of time’ on the Statue of Liberty stuff. Just terrible!

    Actually the 3D in this new ‘Dredd’ wasn’t all that bad. In a few shots it may actually have added a tiny amount and didn’t really detract elsewhere. I think it helped massively that it was actually shot with 3D cameras, so you don’t get the impression of flat elements in a 3D space as with the post-conversion jobs. I still haven’t seen it in 2D so I can’t say for sure what difference it really makes, I suspect not really enough to justify but at least it isn’t actively bad!

    The ‘Slow-Mo’ shots are the ones that work best in 3D and it helps that they are very stylised, suddenly colours become a lot more saturated. The whole thing becomes a lot more vivid. It isn’t just gratuitous either, it’s all tied into the plot and Mega-City One’s latest designer drug.

    The other shot that really stood out to me in 3D was a very simple look down a long empty corridor. I don’t know if it’s just the 3D or if they’ve skewed the perspective in camera (probably a combination of both) but it gives a wonderful sense of depth and just how exposed the Judges are in this killing zone. 3D helping to tell the story! Who’d have thought?

    So, yes, I think this is probably the first film I’ve had anything really positive to say about the 3D. Oh, and they don’t use it as a gimmick, either. None of that throwing things at the viewer or poking a pointy stick in their face.

    Nonetheless, I don’t think I’ll be rushing out for a 3D TV and buying the 3D Blu-ray version but I’m glad I did see it in 3D, if only for future comparison. It still made Karen feel sick and the already dark film is obviously affected further by the glasses. On top of that we all know there is no solving the fundamental convergence/focus issue, either. This cinema 3D is still a botched and totally flawed system but Dredd makes the best of a bad job, I’d say.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.